Akaka, Daniel K. (D-HI) Yes
Baucus, Max (D-MT) Yes
Bingaman, Jeff (D-NM) Yes
Byrd, Robert C. (D-WV) Yes
Cantwell, Maria (D-WA) Yes
Carper, Thomas R. (D-DE) Yes
Conrad, Kent (D-ND) Yes
Dorgan, Byron L. (D-ND) Yes
Inouye, Daniel K. (D-HI) Yes
Johnson, Tim (D-SD) Yes
Kohl, Herb (D-WI) Yes
Landrieu, Mary L. (D-LA) Yes
Lieberman, Joseph I. (D-CT) Yes
Lincoln, Blanche L. (D-AR) Yes
Nelson, Bill (D-FL) Yes
Nelson, E. Benjamin (D-NE) Yes
Pryor, Mark L. (D-AR) Yes
Rockefeller, John D., IV (D-WV) Yes
Salazar, Ken (D-CO) Yes
I don't have any respect for anyone on that list so I'm not surprised. One thing I know for sure, I won't be sending another Vichy Dem to the Senate. When we're going through a fight like this again in 2007, I don't want to have to say my Democratic Senator jumped ship.
Chuck Pennacchio for Senate.
Well, I could not agree more, eRobin! When are certain Dems going to grow some spine? The 'next time' perhaps ..
Posted by: Helga Fremlin | January 30, 2006 at 07:09 PM
When backs are broken, spinal cords don't regenerate. Lesson: We need to face reality. We can't reform these guys. We need to kick them out and replace them with people who aren't wobbly.
Posted by: Psyche | January 30, 2006 at 08:22 PM
I was just coming over here to say it: this would be a great time to post a Pennacchio dairy at dKos.
All the defeatists are saying that we have to carry on supporting Democrats. But to avoid the wrath of the mob they have to pretend that they want to encourage more progressive Dems as well as just "more" of the same.
So why are they supporting Alito-voting Casey when polls show he's behind Pennacchio anyway as soon as voters are told he's pro-life, anti-stem cell and pro-Iraq war?
Posted by: DavidByron | January 30, 2006 at 08:45 PM
Because he can win! La la la la la!
Posted by: eRobin | January 30, 2006 at 08:48 PM
I have respect for Byrd. He's still about the most reliable defender of law and order and the US constitution in congress. Whatever he did it wasn't because of pressure or corruption.
However I don't think he's a Democrat.
I suppose the point is about half of them are not on "our side".
Posted by: DavidByron | January 30, 2006 at 08:57 PM
Well, if Byrd's a defender of law and order and the Constitution _and_ voted for Alito, he's a fool -- a preening, pompous fool.
Posted by: Thomas Nephew | January 31, 2006 at 01:03 AM
Fool maybe. Preening no.
He thinks Alito won't support the royal president. I guess we will all get a good front row seat to see if he was right.
Maybe he is. I suspect these candidates Bush is pushing are mainly for pro-corporate fuck the little guy decisions. The in and out decisions that the SC makes all the time and get no press coverage.
Why rock the corporate boat with shit about abortion or Bush's C-in-C narcissism? There's no profit in it for elites.
Wouldn't that explain the general lack of oposition?
Who knows? There's a total disconnect between the blogosphere and the people they wish to influence. We need "lobbying for dummies" or something.
Posted by: DavidByron | January 31, 2006 at 01:55 AM
If there's one word that describes Byrd, it is preening and no pun intended. Have you ever seen him on the floor?
I think you're right about Alito though. I've said all along that he will be confirmed because he is the choice of the people who really run the country.
Posted by: eRobin | January 31, 2006 at 08:43 AM