Both candidates in the House race for the PA-8th were forced to endure an inquisition by the editorial board of my local paper, the Bucks County Courier Times. Fitzpatrick's appeared on the last day of September. He talked about why he was taking PAC money when Saint Jim (Big Pharma Jim Greenwood) did not. He also discussed his support for limiting medmal payouts to lower healthcare costs; a robustly funded missile defense system; how to win in Iraq (keep on keepin' on); his feeling that a draft will not be necessary and the limits he sets for Social Security reform. The column ended with him evading the issue of Choice.
This is how the paper reports Ginny's interview with the editorial board: (emph mine)
National - not local - issues are the most important to Democratic congressional candidate Ginny Schrader, who talked about her absence from the polls and lack of political experience Thursday before the Courier Times editorial board.
She was asked to account for why she hadn't gained experience at the local level before running for the 8th District congressional seat.
"The important issues to me are national," she said, listing health care, jobs and abortion as her top three issues.
Schrader didn't offer many specifics about what she would do for Bucks County. She mentioned transportation projects she supports, including restarting a rail line to Quakertown and the I-95/turnpike interchange project, which has already been approved by the federal government. She also talked about bringing a veterans cemetery to the Dolington site in Upper Makefield.
Fitzpatrick was never asked to account for his views. He was allowed to explain them. And as for Ginny listing "abortion" as a top issue, I have a confirmation from her campaign manager, who was present at the interview, that she referred to the issue as "choice," which is a big difference.
Further, if you read both stories, you'll see that despite her alleged disregard for local issues, Ginny offers more discussion of them than Fitzpatrick does. The fact is that it's the editorial board that doesn't care to report about local issues, which is obvious from both stories. They'd rather talk to Ginny about why she didn't vote in some off-year elections than about how her environmental policy differs from Fitzpatrick's and how that will impact Bucks County. They'd rather print what Fitzpatrick said about missile defense than find out where he stands on expansion of public transportation to the suburbs. The problem is, they blame Ginny for their own glaring failure, while giving Fitzpatrick a pass.
As always, you can donate to Ginny's campaign here.
Recent Comments